US Naval Institute Proceedings - October 1970
Front Cover, U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Volume 96/10/812, October 1970. GGA Image ID # 1d1582af07
On the Front Cover
Most of the familiar visual elements of the Naval Academy are included in this recent photograph by Norman Goldberg, which admirably complements the article and pictorial featured in this issue.
Issue Summary
The October 1970 issue articles include A Doctrine for Limited War, 1960: A Vintage Year for Submariners, The Other Revolution, Vice Admiral Chuichi Hara: Unforgettable Foe, The Helicopter: Hazardous at Any Height, and more.
Table of Contents
Articles
- A Doctrine for Limited War
(dr. Ro) Beaters. USN
It is the nature of the objectives—not the arms employed or the adversaries—that determines whether a war is or is not "limited." - 1960: A Vintage Year for Submariners
Richard Boyle
From Polaris to polar ice; from submerged circumnavigation of the earth to plumbing the ocean's greatest depth—all yielded to the submariner in one remarkable year. - The Other Revolution
R. P. Holubowicz
Containerization has revolutionized the transportation of general cargo; the carriage of bulk cargoes is undergoing perhaps even more fundamental change. - Vice Admiral Chuichi Hara: Unforgettable Foe
Cdr. D. Bartlett. USNR (Ret.)
The American naval officers who came ashore on Truk at the end of World War II were not expecting to meet the likes of Chuichi Hara. - The Helicopter: Hazardous at Any Height?
U. W. H. Baker, USN
While the helicopter's airworthiness and versatility increases, its crash-worthiness and occupant survivability remain virtually at a standstill. - The Fine Line at the Naval Academy
Vice Adm. James Calvert. USN
The balance between the Naval Academy's professional and academic programs will be maintained as Annapolis girds for its second 125 years. - Pictorial—Annapolis ". . . the word is accountability"
Departments
- The Old Navy
- Comment and Discussion
- Book Reviews
- Professional Reading
- Professional Notes
- Notebook
The opinions and assertions in the Naval Review are the authors' personal views. They are not to be construed as official. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Navy Department or the U. S. Naval Institute.